Still more questions:
1. What if someone uses an AI generated image as a reference image and draws the image themselves?
2. What about using AI generated art as a base image and then editing it?
3. What about taking AI advice about improving art skills/learning about techniques/tools?
4. If we're so friendly to novice artists, why does mainline keeps commissioning artwork? Why not take low quality artwork from new artists? Why is the bar so high? I have a suspicion that if one of the artist from Wesnoth's past changes their username gives the same level of art as was in say 1.4, then it probably won't get accepted. We say we're willing to live with low quality artwork just because it's human, but isn't this a double standard?
5. Once again, I fail to see this Soulless quality in AI artwork, especially in newer engines. And even if it is, I have a feeling that some people would still be willing to take it. While others won't. That's a personal choice. We could have a review panel if necessary to check if the generated images if necessary.
[Simply making a point here, attacking someone is not intended. I mean no offense to anyone, and apologize in advance.]
Another image (non-Wesnoth, but from my public archives of AI generated art from Leonardo AI, model Anime XL):
https://cdn.leonardo.ai/users/88d352f2- ... n_wo_2.jpg
This one has more contrast and I don't see anything soulless either.
1. What if someone uses an AI generated image as a reference image and draws the image themselves?
2. What about using AI generated art as a base image and then editing it?
3. What about taking AI advice about improving art skills/learning about techniques/tools?
4. If we're so friendly to novice artists, why does mainline keeps commissioning artwork? Why not take low quality artwork from new artists? Why is the bar so high? I have a suspicion that if one of the artist from Wesnoth's past changes their username gives the same level of art as was in say 1.4, then it probably won't get accepted. We say we're willing to live with low quality artwork just because it's human, but isn't this a double standard?
5. Once again, I fail to see this Soulless quality in AI artwork, especially in newer engines. And even if it is, I have a feeling that some people would still be willing to take it. While others won't. That's a personal choice. We could have a review panel if necessary to check if the generated images if necessary.
[Simply making a point here, attacking someone is not intended. I mean no offense to anyone, and apologize in advance.]
Another image (non-Wesnoth, but from my public archives of AI generated art from Leonardo AI, model Anime XL):
https://cdn.leonardo.ai/users/88d352f2- ... n_wo_2.jpg
This one has more contrast and I don't see anything soulless either.
Statistics: Posted by bssarkar — Today, 5:21 am
